Under Results Driven Accountability, the ALSDE measures each Local Education Agency's (LEA) performance on both compliance and educational results — and directs its monitoring intensity accordingly. The resources on this page help coordinators understand the differentiated monitoring process, meet annual self-assessment and assurance requirements, keep indicator data accurate, audit their own timelines before monitoring finds them, and manage corrective action and student records with confidence.
The pages below are written for special education coordinators and directors. Each provides a plain-language overview, the applicable legal citations, practical guidance, and common errors identified through monitoring.
The Differentiated Monitoring Process
The six monitoring methods SES uses — on-site, self-assessment, desk review, high-risk assessment, technical assistance, and enhanced self-monitoring — how your LEA's monitoring type is determined, and how the risk assessment is scored.
Annual Self-Assessment and the Document of Assurance
The Part I and Part II self-assessments and the Document of Assurance and Technical Assistance form, due to the ALSDE by September 15 each year — and how to verify the practices behind the assurances you sign.
The State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report indicators Alabama uses to assess LEA performance, including the compliance indicators — and how accurate, on-time data entry protects your LEA twice.
Timelines Self-Audit: A Coordinator's Master Checklist
Every recurring special education deadline — evaluation, IEP, reevaluation, discipline, dispute resolution, and monitoring — consolidated into one master checklist for quarterly auditing against student records.
Responding to monitoring findings within the 30-day correction window with a credible Corrective Action Plan, and managing student records, access logs, and parent records requests.